Invoice discounting and dealer finance are two of the most popular NBFC products for MSMEs. They help small firms get paid faster and buy stock on time. Now, a new RBI draft rule could change how these products work.
In August 2026, RBI proposed that NBFCs should only give term loans. Any loan limit that refills after you repay may be called “revolving credit”. And most NBFCs will not be allowed to offer it.
So every supply chain finance NBFC, every dealer and every MSME supplier is asking one question: Is my product at risk?
The short answer is this: some products are at risk, but not all of them.
I have worked with NBFC credit teams for many years. I have read many RBI drafts. This one is different. It does not ban a product by name. It defines one word, “term loan”. Then it says everything else is revolving credit.
What did RBI propose?
On 6 August 2026, RBI released the draft Reserve Bank of India (Non-Banking Financial Companies – Credit Facilities) Amendment Directions, 2026. It amends the Credit Facilities Directions issued on 28 November 2025.
The main rule is new para 108A. It says an NBFC shall only offer credit products that are term loans. It shall not offer any revolving credit products.
There is one exception. NBFCs that RBI has allowed to issue credit cards can keep offering revolving credit. Today, that means only two firms: SBI Card and BoB Financial Solutions (BoB Cards).
The draft also removes the old chapter on demand and call loans. It has no phase-in period. It says it will apply at once when it is notified. Comments closed on 28 August 2026.
Term loan vs revolving credit: the five tests
This is the most important part of the draft. A facility is a term loan only if it meets all of these tests:
| Test | What it means in simple words |
| Fund-based | Real money is lent. Guarantees and LCs are not covered here. |
| Fixed principal | The sanctioned amount is fixed at the start. |
| One or more tranches | You can disburse in parts. That is allowed. |
| Fixed repayment plan | It is repaid by EMIs or in one bullet, on a set schedule. |
| No reuse | Once repaid, the limit does not come back. |
If a product fails even one test, it is “revolving credit” by default. RBI does not give a list of banned products. It gives a list of what is allowed. The burden of proof sits with the NBFC.
Test 5 is the one that hurts. Most working capital products are built so that the limit comes back when the borrower repays.
Why is RBI doing this?
RBI has been uneasy about this for a while. In March 2025, it warned NBFCs about “perpetual” credit lines. Reports then said NBFCs had about ₹50,000 to ₹60,000 crore in such lines.
RBI’s worries are simple:
- Evergreening. A borrower can draw new money to pay old dues. The loan looks fine, but the stress is hidden.
- Weak tracking. It is harder to spot defaults in a limit that keeps rolling.
- A backdoor credit card. A credit line linked to UPI works like a credit card. Card issuing needs a special RBI licence.
- Bank-like products. Cash credit and overdraft are bank products. RBI wants NBFCs to stay in their own lane.
RBI leaders have also said this is not a new rule. Deputy Governor S. C. Murmu said revolving credit was never really allowed for NBFCs. On 7 October 2026, Governor Sanjay Malhotra called the draft a clarification. Markets read this as a sign that RBI will not dilute it much.
The numbers that matter
Here is the data you need to judge the size of the issue.
| Data point | Figure |
| Revolving facilities in NBFC books (Shriram Finance estimate) | About ₹2 lakh crore |
| Total NBFC loan book (same estimate) | About ₹30 lakh crore |
| Share of book that may need a redesign | Roughly 6–7% |
| NBFC credit to industry, ex-infra (RBI data, Aug 2026) | Over ₹2 lakh crore |
| Perpetual credit lines flagged by RBI (Mar 2025 reports) | ₹50,000–60,000 crore |
| NBFCs exempt from the rule | 2 (card issuers) |
| TReDS invoice financing, FY22 | ₹40,000 crore |
| TReDS invoice financing, FY26 | ₹3.47 lakh crore |
| TReDS financing, Aug–Sep 2026 | ₹75,788 crore (up 36% year on year) |
| Average TReDS invoice financed, FY26 | About ₹21.8 lakh |
| RXIL TReDS throughput, FY26 | ₹1,21,105 crore (up 51%) |
| TReDS financing forecast, FY30 (CareEdge) | ₹8–10 lakh crore a year |
Two points stand out. First, the revolving book is not the whole NBFC story. It is a slice. Second, invoice-based finance is growing very fast. So the way RBI treats it will shape MSME credit for years.
Is invoice discounting at risk?
Let me split invoice discounting RBI rules into two cases.
Case 1: Invoice discounting on TReDS. Here, an NBFC funds one invoice. The buyer has accepted it. The buyer pays on the due date. That is it. There is no limit that refills. Each invoice is a separate deal with a fixed amount and one bullet repayment. In my view, this passes all five tests. It looks safe.
Case 2: Invoice discounting under a rolling limit. Many NBFCs give a supplier a limit, say ₹2 crore. The supplier uploads invoices. The NBFC funds them. When the buyer pays, the limit frees up. The supplier uploads new invoices. This is where the trouble starts. Each invoice may be a short loan. But the limit refills. That fails test 5.
The industry’s view is fair. FIDC, the NBFC industry body, told RBI that a supply chain finance NBFC gives each tranche as a separate term loan. These run for 30 to 180 days. Overdues are watched closely. New funding stops at the first sign of stress. This is very different from a credit card.
But the draft, as written, looks at the limit, not just the tranche. So any supply chain finance NBFC with a refilling limit must review its product now.
Is dealer finance at risk?
Dealer finance is the core of MSME channel finance. A large company (the anchor) sells to dealers. An NBFC funds the dealer’s purchases. The dealer sells the stock and repays. Then the dealer buys again.
This cycle is natural for trade. But in loan terms, it is a revolving limit. Dealers buy stock every week. They cannot apply for a fresh term loan each time.
Vehicle dealer finance (inventory funding for car and two-wheeler dealers) is the clearest example. FIDC named it in its letter. Many FMCG, cement, steel and pharma channel finance programmes work the same way.
So yes, dealer finance in its current form is the most exposed of the trade products.
What the industry asked for
FIDC wrote to RBI on 27 August 2026. It did not ask for a free hand. It asked for a revolving credit exemption with guardrails.
Its main asks were:
- Drop the blanket ban. Allow limited redraws within a declining ceiling.
- Let a borrower who prepays get that amount back as headroom.
- Add safeguards: no extension of maturity, no rise in the sanctioned amount, and no new draw to clear an overdue account.
- Treat a true card or overdraft line differently from a limited redraw facility.
- Protect key products: supply chain finance, factoring, working capital demand loans, MSME loans, vehicle dealer finance, loans against securities and fintech lending products.
FIDC also made a strong point on cost. If MSMEs must take full term loans up front, they pay interest on money they do not need yet. That raises their cost. It also stops them from repaying early.
Where things stand today (November 2026)
The rule is still a draft. RBI has not issued the final circular yet.
But NBFCs are not waiting. On 1 November 2026, Bajaj Finance launched new term-loan versions that do not allow redraws. Tata Capital is testing changed flexi-loan products this month. Some experts say lenders will build new structures for supply chain finance, and that the total hit to NBFC books may be small.
My reading: do not plan for a full rollback. Plan for a final rule that is close to the draft, maybe with some relief for trade-linked products.
Risk check: product by product
| Product | Risk level | Why |
| TReDS invoice discounting | Low | One invoice, fixed amount, one bullet repayment, no refill |
| Single-invoice factoring (no limit) | Low | Works like a short bullet term loan |
| Supply chain finance with a rolling limit | Medium to high | Tranches are term-like, but the limit refills |
| Dealer / channel finance with a rolling limit | High | Limit refills with every purchase cycle |
| Vehicle inventory funding | High | Classic draw-repay-redraw structure |
| Flexi loans and digital credit lines | Very high | The main target of the draft |
| Credit cards from authorised NBFCs | None | Expressly exempt |
What NBFCs should do now
Here is the checklist I share with lenders.
- Map the book. List every facility where a repaid limit can be used again. Note its size and borrower type.
- Run the five tests. Check each product against the term loan definition. Be strict. Assume RBI will be strict too.
- Redesign the limit. Change the “limit” into a programme of separate term loans. Each draw gets its own fixed amount, due date and schedule. Approve each draw on fresh checks: invoice, buyer, overdue status.
- Consider a declining ceiling. For dealer lines, a facility whose cap falls over time is closer to a term loan. It also matches FIDC’s ask.
- Push trade flows to TReDS. Where the buyer is a large firm or a CPSE, TReDS gives a clean, invoice-by-invoice structure.
- Fix the paperwork. Sanction letters, loan agreements and loan management systems must all match the new structure. A product that is a term loan on paper but revolving in the system will not pass an inspection.
- Talk to anchors and dealers early. Do not surprise them. Explain what changes and why.
What MSMEs and dealers should know
If you are a supplier or a dealer, do not panic. Your funding is not about to vanish.
You may see changes like these:
- Each draw may need a fresh approval, with its own due date.
- Your lender may ask you to move to TReDS for invoices from large buyers.
- Your limit may become a “programme” with a cap that falls over time.
- Pricing may change a little as lenders rebuild systems.
Keep your records clean. Pay on time. Upload invoices quickly. Lenders will be quicker to fund borrowers whose data is clear.
Final word
RBI’s aim is fair. It wants to stop hidden evergreening and backdoor credit cards. But trade finance is not a credit card. An invoice is paid by a real buyer from a real sale. That is self-liquidating credit.
The best outcome is a narrow rule. Ban true revolving lines. Allow trade-linked products that are funded invoice by invoice, with strict guardrails. Until the final circular comes, every supply chain finance NBFC should assume the strict version and get ready.
The lenders who redesign early will keep their MSME clients. The ones who wait may lose them.
Connect with an NBFC Advisory Expert
Every NBFC book is different. A small change in how a limit works can decide if a product passes or fails RBI’s test.
Our NBFC advisory team can help you:
- Map your book and find every revolving facility
- Test each product against RBI’s five term loan tests
- Redesign supply chain finance and MSME channel finance into compliant structures
- Update your sanction letters, loan agreements and loan systems
- Prepare for RBI inspection and the final circular
Do not wait for the final rule. Connect with our NBFC advisory team today and make your invoice discounting and dealer finance products RBI-ready.
📞 Call NBFC Advisory: +91 93287 18979
🌐 Visit: nbfcadvisory.com